Joe Biden prosector Jack Smith fired his last volley in the lawfare against Donald Trump.
But even Smith’s allies couldn’t believe how far he was willing to go.
And that’s because Jack Smith crossed a line with this damning attack on Donald Trump.
Jack Smith’s final report
America treated the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report in the January 6 hoax with a collective yawn.
Voters knew that Smith whipped up a batch of bogus charges and raced to try and prosecute, convict, and jail Trump before the election.
The voters rejected this lawfare by re-electing Donald Trump in decisive fashion.
That’s why only members of the media cared about the contents of Smith’s report, which were as stale as old bread.
But Smith’s introductory letter to his report did contain some newsworthy nuggets.
Smith unconvincingly tried to claim he had no political motive in prosecuting Donald Trump.
“To all who know me well, the claim from Mr. Trump that my decisions as a prosecutor were influenced or directed by the Biden administration or other political actors is, in a word, laughable,” Smith claimed.
CNN’s Elie Honig told viewers Smith’s letter went well beyond a prosecutor’s standard defense of his word and called into question everything that came after it because of how emotional Smith showed he was about these criticisms.
“But he goes on a rant! He quotes John Adams. He quotes former attorneys general. He says the criticism of him was ‘laughable.’ And I suppose one could look at that as an important and necessary example of Jack Smith standing up for his team,” Honig stated.
“On the other hand, though, it’s hard to read that and then conclude that everything that follows is completely separate from emotion and completely workmanlike and has nothing to do with his personal feelings,” Honig added.
Politics were the only motivating factor in this case.
Smith pushed for speedy trials in the January 6 and Mar-a-Lago document hoax claiming there was a public interest in resolving the cases before the election.
The only parties that had a clear interest in a trial prior to the election were Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as they counted on a guilty verdict and jail sentence to bail them out with the voters.
But Smith wanted that guilty verdict before the voters went to cast their ballots.
Smith’s letter also included an un-American assertion that the case he assembled would have convicted Donald Trump.
“Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” Smith’s report went on to say.
Jack Smith doesn’t get to play judge, jury, and executioner.
Prosecutors don’t get to declare a defendant guilty.
That’s the job for the jury.
Smith’s case and evidence was never put to the test before a jury and was an attack on the underpinnings of the justice system for Smith to declare Trump guilty without a trial ever being held.
Related posts:
Alina Habba warned Americans that Joe Biden has one last dirty trick left up his sleeve
A RINO traitor just revealed the worst kept secret in Washington
Trey Gowdy was at a loss for words over what he discovered about Donald Trump
