Being a Republican on a national ticket means being the target of the liberal media smear machine.
But sometimes even the press must admit defeat.
And the New York Times called J.D. Vance one name that led to this massive backlash.
New York Times edits headline after smearing J.D. Vance as a Nazi
J.D. Vance focused the news cycle on the issue of immigration by highlighting reports his office received of Haitian migrants kidnapping people’s pets and eating them in the town of Springfield, Ohio.
The allegations finally brought national attention to the fact that Springfield is facing real problems due to some 20,000 Haitian migrants reportedly flocking to a town of 58,000 people.
The facts of the case laid bare the devastation Kamala Harris’ open borders, pro-globalization agenda inflicts on working-class communities in America.
Open borders is second only in the liberal pantheon of values to abortion-on-demand.
That’s because Democrats hope to flood America with as many illegal aliens as possible, knowing the lion’s share will register as Democrats once Kamala Harris grants them amnesty and they gain voting rights.
Liberal media outlets like the New York Times understand that the Left can’t honestly debate the immigration issue.
So the Times seeks to discredit their opponents by smearing them as racists.
That’s the tactic the Times used in assigning the headline “JD Vance’s Blood-and-Soil Nationalism Finds Its Target” to an opinion column.
“Blood and Soil” was a Nazi slogan outlining their ideal of a pure blood race united by land settlement.
Conservatives slammed the Times for sliming Vance as a supposed supporter of racial homogeneity by noting that his wife is the child of Indian immigrants.
“The guy who’s married to a child of immigrants of Indian descent is a ‘blood and soil nationalist’ according to certified lunatic Jamelle Bouie.” conservative commentator Will Chamberlain wrote on X.
The guy who’s married to a child of immigrants of Indian descent is a “blood and soil nationalist” according to certified lunatic Jamelle Bouie. https://t.co/CmMv7zMjQf
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) September 14, 2024
Under intense pressure for falsely claiming Vance supported the Nazi ideology of a master race, the Times threw in the towel.
“Shouldn’t JD Vance Represent All of Ohio?” the new headline read.
The Springfield controversy
Vance later wrote on social media that he raised the issue of Haitian migrants eating cats because of calls to his office from his constituents.
“In the last several weeks, my office has received many inquiries from actual residents of Springfield who’ve said their neighbors’ pets or local wildlife were abducted by Haitian migrants. It’s possible, of course, that all of these rumors will turn out to be false. Do you know what’s confirmed?” Vance stated.
What wasn’t in dispute – Vance pointed out – is the fact that importing 20,0000 Haitian migrants into Springfield made crime worse, increased the spread of diseases like AIDS and tuberculosis, strained social services, and lowered the quality of life.
“That a child was murdered by a Haitian migrant who had no right to be here. That local health services have been overwhelmed. That communicable diseases–like TB and HIV–have been on the rise. That local schools have struggled to keep up with newcomers who don’t know English. That rents have risen so fast that many Springfield families can’t afford to put a roof over their head,” Vance concluded.
The New York Times knows an honest debate on immigration favors Donald Trump because of the facts Vance outlined.
But rather than engage on the merits, the Times resorts to name-calling because once the public believes someone to be a racist or a Nazi, it discredits everything they say.
