The Left’s lawfare against the Trump administration is out of control.
But President Trump is fighting back with a vengeance.
And Donald Trump just put the Supreme Court on the spot with this major demand.
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to rein in rogue judges
In the first two months of the Trump administration, outlaw judges are staging a coup.
Democrat activists installed as district court judges are installing themselves as acting President by issuing nationwide injunctions that usurp the President’s Article II authority.
This is the actual Constitutional crisis.
The Trump administration has a plan to fight back.
An appeal to the Supreme Court on a nationwide injunction to stop President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens.
But the appeal wasn’t on the Constitutionality of the executive order.
Rather, the administration asked the court to take up the question of district court judges making nationwide policy.
In the appeal, the administration noted that power-mad district court judges issued more nationwide injunctions in the first month of the Trump administration than in the first three years of Joe Biden’s Presidency.
“District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs [temporary restraining orders] during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration,” the application reads.
Judges are putting themselves in charge of military readiness standards, executive branch firing protocols, and spending decisions.
The administration argued this amounted to judicial tyranny and made the President Chief Executive in name only.
“That sharp rise in universal injunctions stops the Executive Branch from performing its constitutional functions before any courts fully examine the merits of those actions, and threatens to swamp this Court’s emergency docket,” the application added.
And while the executive order raised real Constitutional questions, the legality of ending birthright citizenship wasn’t the most pressing matter at the moment.
“These cases—which involve challenges to the President’s January 20, 2025 Executive Order concerning birthright citizenship—raise important constitutional questions with major ramifications for securing the border,” the application continued.
“But at this stage, the government comes to this Court with a ‘modest’ request: while the parties litigate weighty merits questions, the Court should ‘restrict the scope’ of multiple preliminary injunctions that ‘purpor[t] to cover every person * * * in the country,’ limiting those injunctions to parties actually within the courts’ power,” the application went on to say.
Conservative Justices have been itching to take up the question of district court judges issuing nationwide injunctions for some time.
In a case over the abortion pill, Justice Neil Gorsuch expressed his frustration with dictators in black robes appointing themselves the decider of public policy in America.
“We’ve had, one might call it, a rash of universal injunctions,” Gorsuch declared. “And this case seems like a prime example of turning a lawsuit into a nationwide legislative assembly on an FDA rule or any other federal government action.”
Related posts:
Donald Trump was blindsided when an NBC reporter made this painful confession
Keith Olbermann just demanded ESPN fire Pat McAfee after he described Canada with these two hilarious words
Donald Trump made a surprising announcement about Tesla that nearly brought Elon Musk to tears
