Former Congresswoman Liz Cheney and her co-conspirators on the January 6th Committee tried to gaslight the American people over what happened that day.
But now the truth is out there.
And Liz Cheney will be sweating bullets over this January 6 bombshell.
Another conspiracy theory proves true
Representative. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) January 6th Select Committee and the media labeled anyone who claimed the FBI had undercover agents in the crowd on January 6 as dangerous conspiracy theorists.
A Department of Justice Inspector General report exposed this to be a lie.
The report found there were 26 confidential human sources in the crowd that day for the FBI.
This doesn’t count other agencies with domestic law enforcement authority like the Department of Homeland Security.
There were likely far more undercover operatives in the crowd that day.
And the report doesn’t answer the question of how many government spies engaged in violence.
Vice President-elect J.D. Vance noted the idea that the government had operatives on the ground that day was another conspiracy theory that is now widely-acknowledged as fact, just like how the media and censorship industrial complex once labeled it a conspiracy theory to claim the coronavirus originated in a lab.
“For those keeping score at home, this was labeled a dangerous conspiracy theory months ago,” Vance wrote on X.
For those keeping score at home, this was labeled a dangerous conspiracy theory months ago. https://t.co/gNJPUuRp5U
— JD Vance (@JDVance) December 12, 2024
Elon Musk responded with a joke.
“What’s the difference between a ‘right-wing conspiracy’ and reality? About 6 months,” Musk snarked.
What’s the difference between a “right-wing conspiracy” and reality? About 6 months. https://t.co/NZTdG0zKdn
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 13, 2024
Unanswered questions about FBI spies on January 6
The report found that three FBI spies entered the Capitol on January 6.
None were charged.
The FBI even reimbursed one of these confidential human sources for their travel expenses for coming to D.C.
The FBI arrested over 1,500 other Trump supporters for what took place that day.
George Washington Law professor Jonathan Turley wondered why these three got such special treatment.
“Moreover, there is a question of why the three sources who entered the Capitol were not charged as part of an operation that the Justice Department described as an effort to ‘shock and awe’ targeting everyone involved on that day,” Turley wrote.
Turley added that the Justice Department claiming the FBI never ordered any of these undercover operators to the Capitol that day doesn’t answer the question of what they did once there.
“The IG found that most of these individuals were there without any instructions or requests from the government. However, as paid sources for the FBI, the question is what they did on that day,” Turley added.
Turley wrote that the government hid this information from defendants who could have used the discovery process in their cases to uncover what these FBI spies did that day and if it would help exonerate them had they any confidential sources encouraged or engaged in violence.
“The IG suggests that they were not engaged in the core criminal conduct prosecuted on that day. Yet, if revealed to the defense, including hundreds who pleaded guilty, defense counsel would not just take the government’s word for what these sources did on that day,” Turley concluded.